Thursday, August 1, 2024

Why I Don't Recommend the Leica Monochrom Cameras

In This Issue

  • Why I Don't Recommend the Leica Monochrom Cameras
  • Photography Isn't Art
  • Announcements of Upcoming Events (Seminars, Safari, Cameracraft Magazine)
  • My New Competition
  • Live Streaming with the Sony A7 IV
  • Geeking with Gary (google URL shortener depreciation)

Let's get right to it then, shall we?


Why I Don't Recommend the Leica Monochrom Cameras

One of the attendees of the Plymouth seminar in April had one of Leica's B&W Monochrom(e) cameras, which promised much higher image quality because there was no RGB layer on top of the sensor, completely eliminating the need for the demosiacing step that adds color to the image.  He was very proud of his acquisition.  During the seminar I explained why I would never recommend one (and would never use one myself).  Sure, it takes you back to the days of shooting B&W film, and sure, the promise of better quality images is quite appealing (even if it's only a theoretical advantage), but ultimately you give up a lot of control over how your final image is rendered.

Then I showed the attendees some examples of what you can get if you start with a color image and use Photoshop's Channel Mixer to control how individual colors get rendered to specific shades of grey (click on any image to view larger and sharper):

Normally green and red will render as the same shade of grey when shot in B&W mode; using Photoshop's Channel Mixer lets you dictate how certain colors will translate to which shade of grey.


This last imagae was made in a B&W darkroom, starting with a color negative and using two different colored filters in the enlarger to influence how certain colors would render.

I actually talked about this in a previous blog post from 2012, but I feel it bears repeating.  

Photography Isn't Art

Both images generated via DALL-E 3

This is an old attitude, but its roots are understandable.  To be an artist before photography was invented you had to have a skill - painting a realistic-looking image, for example, required a great understanding of light and shadow and color and proportion and making things recognizable.  Then there's the added layer of being able to communicate emotion using these tools.  Similar thing with sculpture - it took years of practice to master these skills.

When photography came about, those traditional artists scoffed at the new medium.  "All you have to do is push a button!" they said.  I totally get that.  Rightly or wrongly, that attitude has persisted, although the photographers that have vision and technical acuity have been able to elevate that perception.  

Here's a heretical summary of how art was perceived through the ages:

  • If the oil painting depicts a religious figure, it's art.
  • Okay, if it's an oil painting, then it's art.  Watercolors don't count.
  • Photography isn't art.
  • Okay, photography can be art but only if it's taken with a large-format camera.
  • Okay, B&W photography is art, but not if it's printed on resin-coated paper.
  • Okay, color photos are allowed, but only Cibachromes.
  • Digital images printed on inkjet printers are not art.  
  • It's only art if it was shot on B&W film, processed in a darkroom, and printed on fiber-based acid-free paper.

Continuing this trend, here are my heretical predictions for art definitions in the future:

  • Mobile phone pictures are not art.
  • Okay, iPhone photos can be art, because Apple says so.  
  • 3D-printed statues are not art.
  • Holograms are not art.
  • Okay, holograms can be art, but only the full-spectrum variety made with a high-intensity pulsed laser.

Now we have generative AI art like Midjourney, where all the photographers are exclaiming, "That's not art!  All you did was type a few words!"  Oh, the irony.

===

I've been keeping abreast of the flood of creations in the world of AI art (and share quite a few of the noteworthy ones on the facebook group First Thursday Gallery Walk for which I'm an administrator).  I am constantly impressed by the ideas and initial creativity behind the text prompts.  For example, someone had to think of Pope Francis as Batman, the Caped Crusader from the Holy city of Vatican

AI artwork by Andrea Christine Bratton 

AI artwork by Mayhem's Art and Music

This genius video showing older celebrities hugging their younger selves.  AI artwork by Boomer Friki.

The thing that cuts across all of these art media is the initial idea - in my seminars I call it "Pre-visualizing the image" before you ever pick up your camera - that is the root of the art and it continues to be a requirement for great art.  Without that vision, tools like Midjourney will usually just produce meaningless output.

So, yes, generative AI images can certainly be art.  (So, too, can photography. :-) )  It all starts with the vision.


*** Announcements *** 

Seminars

The next two seminars will be happening in September:

Florence, Alabama - (Not far from Huntsville and Nashville) Sponsored by the Quad Cities Photography Club (The Shoals) - September 14-15, 2024  

Kansas City, Kansas - Sponsored by Digital Dimensions and Beyond Camera Club - September 21-22, 2024

NEW!  There’s also an optional Wireless Flash workshop, taking place at the end of Day 2 of the seminar, designed to help you overcome the intimidation that most people feel when it comes to learning Wireless Flash.  I’ve been teaching Wireless Flash for 15 years; it’s the single most important tool for adding “Wow!” to your images, and you probably already have the tools you need to put it to work!  (Examples of this technique appear in in my books - an entire chapter is devoted to this useful technique!)  It will improve your photography much more than getting a bigger camera or a more expensive lens.  

Come join us for a fun weekend!  Enroll now.

Your photo club can hire me to bring the seminars to you!  Contact me for details.

Safari Update

The photo safari is getting close (November!) and we had one family drop out, so there is now some room!  This is a tour of three game reserves designed to cater to the unique needs of photographers.  They know the importance of good light; where the animals will be, and they know how to take care of you, from airport arrival the final departure.  Join me and my wife Carol on a unique adventure, talk shop, share your images, and generally give your camera something to do!  Details at https://FriedmanArchives.com/safari . Let me know if you're even thinking about going and I'll bring you up to speed.


Next Time in Cameracraft Magazine

The next issue goes to press next week.  In it I interview Nick Brandt, the former filmmaker now using photography to illustrate the disproportionate impact that humans have had on the environment, and how he’s set out to illustrate the environmental decline.  

Wasteland with Elephant, 2015

He has created several different projects over the years, as you can see on his home page www.NickBrandt.com.  In Inherit the Dust (2016), he photographed places in East Africa where the animals used to roam. In each location, life size panels of animal portrait photographs were erected, setting the panels within a world of explosive human development.

“As with all my previous work, this series was shot on black and white medium format film. Each panorama was constructed out of six by seven negatives stitched together in Photoshop to create the final widescreen view.”  The final enlargements are truly magnificent. 

Just don’t ask him if he had just photoshopped the animal pictures into the composition.  That will unleash his silent scream. :-)

Subscribe to Cameracraft Magazine today for photographer profiles and technical insights you just won't find anywhere else!


My New Competition

Notice that this isn't even a picture of the camera.
Someone spent a whole six minutes with ChatGPT and came out with a "guide" for a Sony camera.  It's 125 pages (mine is 800+), no photo illustrations (mine contain hundreds), and overall is pretty f&%#@ useless.  But I know from experience that, unlike what they taught us in kindergarten, there's no correleation between good products and products that sell.

Have a look at some of the sample pages from this useless book.

The book got only one star and yet it appears at the top of the amazon search results list.  This author has dozens of different titles all of similar quality.   

This is just the beginning of worthless AI-generated content diluting the real stuff created by knowledgeable writers and human editors.  Of course Amazon has no incentive whatsoever to remove the content from their catalogs, relying instead on the rating and review mechanism and the voluntary labeling of the book as "AI generated" by the person who lists it.


*** Geeking with Gary ***

Live Streaming with the Sony A7 IV

Spring 2024 saw a lot of Sony cameras get a lot of firmware updates. But only the A7 IV got this new feature. It allows you to use your camera to live stream to platforms such as Youtube or Facebook through either wi-fi or your smartphone’s Wi-Fi hot spot.

I detailed the use of this new feature with my free A7 IV supplement (which covered all of the other new features as well).  I was going to make a youtube video showing step-by-step how to do this, but someone in Australia named Wonk beat me to it, and he did a reasonable job. Why reinvent the wheel?  You can see it at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXH8YhxYfvI .


Google ends support for link shortener - including links to Google Photos

Google is famous for creating fresh new products and then abandoning them.  (This website documents them all - 295 products as of this writing.)  On July 19th they announced that their link shortening service, goo.gl, will disappear in a year.    

Link shorteners are services that can replace ungodly URLs like this:

https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipP5ToGbPdq7skb_o_grxGYawBEi8c6V5xhXbFM_jBnG6crJttizSuMUNHkgeW3uAg?key=ZGJiZkY0WGExOTc1MkltV3RXN09ydXJmM08wZU53

with something neat like 

https://photos.app.goo.gl/sVAoycznAnLDsAmf9

Of course this news is both good and bad.  Link shorteners are really useful when you're including long URLs into magazine articles and printed books (where readers can't click on it and it would be too tedious to read and re-type the URL by hand.  (Plus, l's and 1's O's and 0's all look alike!)).  On the other hand they pose a huge security risk because if one appears in an incoming email, there's usually no way of checking if it goes to a malicious site or not.  So it's a double-edged sword.

The part that impacts me the most is the fact that I use Google Photos A LOT (see my praise for this service here and here), and have been sharing albums with customers, family and friends for well over a decade via the shortened links like in the 2nd example above.  This means that after a year, those links will no longer take them to the photos I shared.  

I'm going to send an email to everyone I've ever sent photos to, telling them of the impending shutdown and if they want to keep the photos I've shared with them (it's my legacy to them, after all!), they need to search for emails from me that contain goo.gl and download all of the content I've shared.  

The silver lining in all of this is that my family will have an excuse to revisit these old photos, most of which they've no doubt forgotten about.  Old photos can be like fine wine, their value increases with age.  Especially if they're snapshots which jog a neuron in the viewer.

But the part which frustrates me and countless others is the question, "How inconvenient is it to just keep a server plugged in and move it to a corner of the server farm?"  It's not like the service requres any updates or anything.  It takes virtually nothing to keep the service going and inconveniences millions (and removes access to arbitrarily large amounts of web content) to pull the plug on it.

Next Blog Post

In the next edition, I'll be reviewing a new tool to bring proper focus bracketing to the Sony platform (that promises to work much better than Sony's current solution, which I don't care for).  Stay tuned!


Until next time,

Yours Truly, Gary Friedman


29 comments:

  1. Instead of link shorteners, I insert QR-Codes in printed material of any on-line references or active clickable links in electronic PDF files, usually both because the PDF can be read on-screen or as a printed document. In emails, I just paste the full active link so that recipients can see what it is they are directed to before clicking on it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's a great idea. Can PDF readers on the desktop read\click through to urls, or must you take a picture of it with your phone?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LibreOffice Writer automatically creates hyperlinks once pasted into the document followed by a space. All links continue to be active in any document exported directly as a PDF and should work with any reader, and certainly should with Adobe Reader.

      Either the phone camera or a dedicated app like QR Droid will scan and give option to view or open a QR-Code. My Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro phone camera recognizes QR-Codes and asks what I want to do.

      I printed, cut, and taped QR-Codes to pictures and video inside my Christmas card last year, so that recipients could see and wonder at a cicada emerging from its exoskeleton.

      Also, instead of Google, SmugMug might be a better option for collections of professional photographs. Of course, there's an annual membership fee involved, though I think there is a limited free account. There is also a "selling" option that I don't use because I'm a casual amateur; it is possible to control the resolution of the downloads, though I leave it wide open. Here's the example:

      https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-6QKhKd/

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the tips! Those cicada photos are awesome.

      Delete
    3. By the way: LibreOffice Writer has a built-in QR-Code generator that you can find in the menu sequence "Insert->Object->QR and Barcode...". Once inserted you can resize and reposition the object as needed. Otherwise you will need a third party app generate the graphic.

      Delete
    4. The latest editions of the Affinity suite (Photo, Publisher and Designer) have a very good QR code generating tool

      Delete
    5. Thanks to you all for the new info! Now I wish LibreOffice had an "Export to .epub" function. :-)

      Delete
  3. 'Art' is simply in the mind of the beholder. I've seen 'art' that others think is trash and I've seen trash that other think is 'art'!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like the reply to the old question “Is photography art?” ‒ “Is painting art?”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some questions are eternal, like "Is there a God?"

      Delete
  5. good blog, thanks. Gary are you aware Adobe's new policy of cloud only saving of files/their access to this and your response?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not! I've always been able to save files on my local hard drive with all Adobe products. Not sure I understand what you meant after the slash.

      Delete
  6. You shouldn't even consider that Sony A9 III book competition. Complete trash.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! But I had to buy a copy to learn just how bad it was. I asked Amazon for a refund. They granted it right away and even told me no need to send it back!

      Delete
  7. Thanks yet again Gary,
    Have to say you must be missing a few thousand "photography is not art" statements there. (pre phone even).. With a "how dare you glare".
    And even those generated out of outright indignant arrogance by 'niche photo clubs' and photographers themselves to keep a mistique about photography...
    Kept a lot of us out as youngsters til we got old enough to tell them to... And and learn there were those who weren't arrogant out there to learn from 😁👍

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see I struck a nerve with you. Sorry to jog such negative neurons.

      Delete
  8. It "Struck a nerve" with me as well. Great Blog by the way. As someone who displays no less than five Gary Friedman original prints in my home, I believe images shot with a camera absolutely qualify as Art. The creativity of the construction of the shot, coupled with the subject matter, makes it art. I've always appreciated your point of view. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  9. *Starts Blog called 'The Freidman Archives Blog' using ChatGPT* after inputing all of Gary's previous work.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The "author" Iza Tek of the A9iii book has a whole series of AI generated books that are similarly terrible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I had linked to to the "Other books by this author" page on Amazon to show that off. The sad part is this person is probably making a healthy living off of unsuspecting people who think that if the book doesn't make sense to them, it must be them and not the book.

      Delete
  11. The Alpha Focus Bracketing App? Leonardo has been very responsive to my inquiries, but I am unable to make it work between my a1 and Samsung Galaxy. Will try an old iPhone presently.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. (Shhhh! Don't give away the ending! :-) ) Yes, that's the app, but I've been so swamped with projects that I don't anticipate having time to play with it for at least two more weeks. Leonardo has been very good corresponding with me as well! Gotta love a guy who takes the time to respond to individual customers' needs. :-)

      Delete
  12. When I look at this trusted source for information
    https://9to5google.com/2024/07/18/googl-links/

    it refers to links starting with https://goo.gl, and specifically calls out this scenario at the start

    "After Google stopped generating new goo.gl URLs in March of 2019, those links will stop working on August 25, 2025."

    Given that Google Photos generated a link of the form https://photos.app.goo.gl, just yesterday, when the article refers to URLS not generated since March 2019, I think the URL shortener that is going away is different than the shared link generated for photo albums. And technically speaking, photos.app.goo.gl is a different URL than goo.gl

    I haven't been able to find any other references to Google Photo shared links going away on any subreddit, and I suspect the outcry would be huge if all the existing shared links for photos were going away.

    So my $0.02 is that a shared link to Google Photos is NOT the same as a shortened URL, generated by the soon to be turned off Google URL shortener translation service, despite the fact the links share some common text.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for this additional research! Hard to get a definite answer right now, but I'll try to stay on top of this.

      Delete
  13. Thanks Gary, love your stories.

    ReplyDelete
  14. About "Google ends support for link shortener - including links to Google Photos"
    The blog https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-url-shortener-links-will-no-longer-be-available/ where the deprecation was announced mentioned: "Note that goo.gl links generated via Google apps (such as Maps sharing) will continue to function."
    The Google Photos team has provided the Google Photos Product experts with an update, indicating that no changes are expected to affect those links. Therefore, we can assume that the album links will remain functional when goo.gl is deprecated.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comment! All comments must be approved by a moderator before they will appear.